Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nadia Rawson vs Laura Deigman Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Rawson vs Deigman analysis and find out who is favored!
Nadia Rawson vs Laura Deigman Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Rawson 0 - 0 Deigman
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Rawson has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Deigman has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Rawson, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Deigman has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Rawson has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Deigman has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Rawson has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Deigman winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Rawson has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 35% (W/L 6/ 11), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 29% (W/L 4/ 10). Deigman has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 41% (W/L 71/ 102), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 8).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Rawson has played against opponents with an average rank of while Deigman has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Rawson has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Deigman has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Rawson has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Deigman has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
629
High
31
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
Form
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
32% (10-21)
Career Total W/L
38% (90-147)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nadia Rawson | Laura Deigman |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Nadia Rawson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats 
Ulrikke Eikeri
Player
Nadia Rawson
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
62%
(
51 of
82)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
6
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Celia Cervino Ruiz
Player
Nadia Rawson
80%
(
49 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lauren Proctor
Player
Nadia Rawson
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
29%
(
9 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
51%
(
38 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
72
Total Points Won
77
|
1-6 6-4 13-11 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Amarni Banks
Player
Nadia Rawson
50%
(
32 of
64)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
3
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
6
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
35 of
45)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
10%
(
1 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
76
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 3-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elena-Teodora Cadar
Player
Nadia Rawson
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
49%
(
18 of
37)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Katarina Stresnakova
Player
Nadia Rawson
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
19%
(
3 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hina Inoue
Player
Nadia Rawson
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Catherine Harrison
Player
Nadia Rawson
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Laura Deigman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 0-6 6-2 10-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 2-6 6-1 10-7 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Eden Silva
Player
Laura Deigman
79%
(
58 of
73)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
76)
86
Total Points Won
63
|
3-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 2-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Rawson Vs Deigman Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
